Philosophy and Theology
“Flower of Fire: Hekate in the Chaldean Oracles,” appears in Bearing Torches: A Devotional Anthology for Hekate, available here or here.
Once the individual attains theosis, is he a Henad?
The individual mortal soul (e.g., the human individual) is always henadic just insofar as s/he is individual and unique; but his/her individuality is problematic in the way that the individuality of a divine individual (a henad stricto sensu, if you will) is not.
We cannot think “Socrates” without entailments such as “rational animal”, “son of Sophroniscus”, “Athenian”, “snub-nosed practitioner of dialectic”, etc. These relations lie on the same ontological plane, so to speak, as the identity “Socrates”. In this respect, Socrates cannot be a henad.
However, there is an individuality to Socrates that transcends being the son of Sophroniscus, because it chose to be a certain man’s son, that transcends even being a rational animal insofar as it might, under the influence of some passion, choose to become a swan, like Orpheus does (Rep. X, 620a). It transcends the opposition between Socrates and his naysaying daimon, for the daimon as well as the one to whom it says “No” are both manifestations of its agency, its choice. This individual is necessarily in some sense a henad, it seems to me.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.